Dive deeper into Japan
with Japan correspondent
Kjeld Duits
Home » November 2007 » Tibbets Did Duty in Dropping Bomb, But Then Reveled in It

Tibbets Did Duty in Dropping Bomb, But Then Reveled in It

Wednesday, November 7, 2007 Posted: 10:08 AM JST

(by Pierre Tristam) - How convenient, this forgetting — this respected ignorance — that the only nation to have ever used the deadliest of all weapons of mass destruction, the only nation to have terrorized a country by means of those weapons, the only nation to have nuked civilians, twice, with questionable necessity, obliterating 340,000 lives (by the time all the deaths related to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were tallied five years out), is us, the United States.

How convenient the distance — geographic, historical, but mostly willed — from the horror those bombings inflicted, the "pity and terror," as Richard Rhodes described it in "The Making of the Atomic Bomb," the men of the Manhattan Project could foresee even as they built the bomb and saw its first test in the New Mexico desert that July dawn in 1945. "Now we are all sons of bitches," Kenneth Bainbridge, director of the Trinity test, told Robert Oppenheimer, the Manhattan Project director, within moments of the blast. "We waited until the blast had passed," Oppenheimer would later recall, "walked out of the shelter and then it was extremely solemn. We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried." And Oppenheimer remembered a line from Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita: "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."

No amount of metaphysical anguish or contrition could approximate the suffering the bomb would unleash 21 days later, not on desert sands but on Hiroshima's human beings, where the world ended 43 seconds after the Enola Gay, the B-29 carrying the four-ton "Little Boy," dropped it over the courtyard of Shima Hospital. "It was all impersonal," is how Enola Gay commander Paul Tibbets described it.

To him, maybe. Not to those below, where birds ignited in midair and human beings left their silhouetted outlines on the side of buildings. In the words of a fifth-grade boy who survived: "I had the feeling that all the human beings on the face of the Earth had been killed off." A husband helping his wife: "While taking my severely-wounded wife out to the riverbank by the side of the hill of Nakahiro-machi, I was horrified, indeed, at the sight of a stark naked man standing in the rain with his eyeballs in his palm. He looked to be in great pain but there was nothing I could do for him." A first-grade girl: "We were still in the river by evening and it got cold. No matter where you looked there was nothing but burned people all around."

So tell me, now. Why is this Web site I'm looking at (enolagay.org) selling a "Little Boy Bomb Replica signed by Pilot and Navigator of the Enola Gay," for $350 plus $15 for shipping and handling? There's a picture of the blue bomb, "handcrafted solid mahogany replica," 1/12 scale, "approx. 10 inches long." Why is the Web site hawking print after print of the Enola Gay and Tibbets, of a "combo special" (autographed Tibbets book and print, "$95 + FREE SHIPPING!")?

Because that's what Tibbets did in his old age. He peddled WMD memorabilia, as repugnant a trade as the kind that specializes in the trinkets of Pol Pot's harvests. People bought in. That's what happens when atrocity is not only overlooked but transformed into something essential and heroic. Harry Truman did it politically when he declared the dropping of the bomb "the greatest thing in history." Tibbets did it folklorically. And a war crime became a whoop.

There's no begrudging Tibbets for fulfilling his mission Aug. 6, 1945. No one had the right to demand of him that he represent some kind of national atonement. But there's a difference between a soldier honoring his service and a war lover celebrating it. Tibbets didn't just defend his role in the bombing. He reveled in it, toured on it, profited from it, re-enacted it. He used his stature to slur history and the memory of the Hiroshima victims when he joined forces with veterans groups opposing a Smithsonian exhibit featuring the Enola Gay and the victims of the bombing. The exhibit went on, the historical context and Japanese perspective summarily censored.

Tibbets died at 92 last week. It may be crude to speak ill of the dead. But it was a Tibbets specialty. He told Studs Terkel in a 2002 interview, just months after the Sept. 11 attacks, that nuking Arab and Islamic capitals was the best response. "If," he said, "the newspapers would just cut out the s—" 'You've killed so many civilians!' That's their tough luck for being there." What a hero.

Pierre Tristam is a columnist and editorial writer at the Daytona Beach News-Journal in Florida, the Middle East Guide for About.com, and editor of Candide's Notebooks, a Web site.

Keywords: opinion_item

*   *   *

5 comments so far post your own

1 | At 07:39am on Jan 03 2008, A wrote:
I agree that it's disgraceful. I was horrified when I first went to the Hiroshima war memorial. Seeing those images and hearing and reading the stories brought a tear to my eye.
How anyone can not only happily live their life after the event but also make a profit from it is beyond me.
2 | At 01:00am on Jul 04 2008, palden dorji wrote:
i really felt very bad and sad...this is disgrace..i cant forgive whoever did this and why..
3 | At 01:02am on Jul 04 2008, palden dorji wrote:
what ever maybe the reason ..
killing those innocent people...
what wrong did the lil girl do to deserve all this ..
4 | At 12:21am on Jul 31 2008, Zach wrote:
While Tibbets' comments are not heroic, let us not forget who started the war nor the brutality under which it was conducted by troops of the Japanese Empire. It's a shame it took nuclear weapons to end it. Even more shameful is it took two nuclear weapons. The Japanese should have folded the cards after Hiroshima.Perhaps its karma for what they did to Chinese civilians.
5 | At 12:39am on Jul 31 2008, Kjeld Duits wrote:

1. Targeting civilians is considered a war crime under the Geneva Convention.

2. If Japanese brutality justifies using two nuclear weapons, many nations invaded and brutalized by US forces over the past century or so, would be justified to nuke the USA. I don't think that is a good idea.

3. There is no humane weapon of course, but the nuclear bomb is extraordinarily inhumane, and just like outlawed chemical and biological weapons as well as land-mines, keeps on killing and maiming long after the conflict has ended. Anybody who justifies the use of nuclear weapons, either doesn't understand the nature of the beast or has strong sadistic tendencies.
Subscribe to newsletter:
First name:
Daily:   Biweekly:

(Unsubscribe or Update)

We Recommend:


The now legendary Sir Ernest Mason Satow (1843-1929) was a member of the British legation in Tokyo for twenty-one years. This classic book is based on the author's detailed diary, personal encounters, and keen memory. In it, Satow records the history of the critical years of social and political upheaval that accompanied Japan's first encounters with the West around the time of the Meiji Restoration. Fascinating.
Stone Bridge Press

Syndicate iKjeld news

Powered By Greymatter

© 2001~ iKjeld.com/Kjeld Duits. All rights reserved.
To publish, broadcast, rewrite or redistribute this material, please contact us.